In a case in South Carolina dealing with pregnant women and drug abuse, the Supreme Court ruled that:
A) suspects in custody who voluntarily submit to a lie detector test have given up their right against self-incrimination, and their results are admissible at trial.
B) DNA evidence is always admissible due to its high rate of reliability.
C) consensual fingerprinting of children with criminal records expunged by the courts are not admissible at trial.
D) consensual blood tests violate the Fifth Amendment';s prohibition against unreasonable searches.
E) non-consensual urine tests violate the Fifth Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable searches.
E) non-consensual urine tests violate the Fifth Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable searches.
You might also like to view...
Who is a bankruptcy petition preparer and what is his or her role? What restrictions are placed on bankruptcy petition preparers?
What will be an ideal response?
The right to work is a creature of
a. state statute b. federal statute c. common law d. all of the above
Notice of removal should?
A. ?be served with the answer. B. ?state facts in support of state jurisdiction. C. ?state that all defendants have joined in the removal action. D. ?remand the action to state court.
In all states, minors cannot disaffirm those contracts they entered by lying about their age.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)