What was the Court ruling in Apodaca v. Oregon (1972)? What are the criticisms to this decision?
What will be an ideal response?
According to the Court in Apodaca v. Oregon (1972), neither an 11-to-1 nor a 10-to-2 vote to convict in a felony case violates the Sixth Amendment. Critics of the Apodaca and Johnson decisions argue that unanimity instills confidence in the system, ensures participants' careful deliberation, and guarantees the hearing of minority viewpoints. Furthermore, unanimity prevents government oppression and supports the established legal preference for freeing 100 guilty persons rather than convicting one innocent individual. Finally, unanimity comports better with the requirement that criminal convictions rest on proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
You might also like to view...
When did the first documented attempt to identify someone using the iris occur? Who was responsible for this attempt?
What will be an ideal response?
The ________ staff members are concerned with encouraging prisoners to participate in educational, vocational, and treatment processes.
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
____________________ crime is often referred to as "street crime."
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
Which basic type of PSI report is usually less exhaustive and less time consuming and is typically done in misdemeanor and less serious felony cases?
a. Short form b. State form c. General form d. None of the above