What is truth in sentencing? Do you agree that it is an important concept? Why or why not?
What will be an ideal response?
Truth in sentencing is when there is a close correspondence between the sentence imposed upon an offender and the time actually served prior to release from prison. Many states have replicated the federal truth-in-sentencing model because the federal government has made funds available to states for prison construction. It is an important concept because of the issue of deterrence, and it gives true meaning to the sentences imposed by the court.
You might also like to view...
Curbing recidivism rates might be achieved by:
A) greater funding of probation programs. B) closer supervision of clients by POs. C) lower caseloads for POs. D) All of the above
The Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act and Electronic Communications Privacy Act govern law enforcement electronic surveillance the federal level only
a. True b. False
A defendant may be able to use the doctrine of collateral estoppel to prevent a trial involving facts that have been presented at a prior trial. A defendant may successfully invoke the defense of collateral estoppel
A) when the crimes for which the second trial is being held are the precise same crimes that were litigated in the first trial. B) when the issues involved are the same issues that were determined in the defendant's favor or facts on which the defendant prevailed at the first trial. The defendant cannot be forced to relitigate settled facts. C) only where the doctrine of double jeopardy can also be invoked successfully. D) only where the judge at the second trial is the same judge who presided over the first trial since there is a danger of unfair prejudice by the judge. E) when the attorneys for both sides are the same attorneys who represented the parties at the first trial.
Reliance on generalizing may result in stereotyping
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false