What are the five considerations justifying the automobile exception as stated in Robbins v. California?
What will be an ideal response?
The five considerations justifying the automobile exception as stated in Robbins v.
California are: (1) The mobility of motor vehicles often makes obtaining a judicial
warrant impractical. (2) A diminished expectation of privacy surrounds the
automobile. (3) A car is used for transportation, not as a residence or a repository of
personal effects. (4) The car's occupants and contents travel in plain view. (5)
Automobiles are necessarily highly regulated by the government.
You might also like to view...
Relatively little of the heroin from Afghanistan and other countries in the Golden Crescent are destined for the United States
a. True b. False
Which of the following statements suggests prevalence of reasoned staff–inmate culture in a prison?
a. Staff follow policy or checkwith supervisors before makingdecisions. b. Staff make decisions with fullknowledge and consistent withprison principles and values. c. Staff use agency incentivesand disincentives for gainingcompliance from inmates. d. Staff demand compliance frominmates through threats andintimidation.
The possibility of recognizing known writing habits in samples produced when a writer is under the influence of drugs or alcohol is _____ the possibility of recognizing known writing habits produced
when the writer of a sample is not under the influence of drugs or alcohol. a. less than b. greater than c. the same as
All of the following are legitimate reasons to conduct psychological testing of police recruits EXCEPT:
a. Reduce potential liability b. Identify those who will likely be promoted during their careers c. Screen out psychopathology d. Minimize corruption