Assume that Debra and Mike, without trading with each other, will produce and consume the following number of pizzas and wings Now, assume that both Debra and Mike decide to specialize, and then Debra trades 19 pizzas to Mike for 47 wings. This outcome is shown in the table below. Compared to the result without trade, what are the gains from trade that Debra experiences when she and Mike specialize and trade?
What will be an ideal response?
1 pizza and 7 wings
Feedback:
Specialization leads to greater productivity. But Debra and Mike would both like to eat pizza and wings. So if they specialize and then trade with each other, they will benefit. If Debra gives Mike 19 pizzas in exchange for 47 wings, she is better off by 1 pizza and 7 wings. (Mike, in this scenario, has the same gains from trade, 1 pizza and 7 wings.)
You might also like to view...
According to your text, economic theory developed to answer which question?
A) Why does man have the will to power? B) Can we create a government strong enough to tie its own hands? C) How are countless individuals led to do "the right thing" without ever caring about doing good? D) Is greed good?
In the long-run equilibrium, both the perfectly competitive firm and the monopolistically competitive firm produce the output at which MR=MC and charge a price equal to the average total cost of production
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
The typical by-product of policies that create more equality by making the rich worse off is _____
a. an increase in the economic multiplier b. a decline in conspicuous consumption c. and increase in social stratification d. a lowering of economic productivity
In the short run, if a firm operates, it earns a profit of $500. The fixed costs of the firm are $100. This firm has a producer surplus of
A) $500. B) $100. C) $400. D) $600.