Under the terms of the War Powers Resolution, a president may only introduce armed forces into conflict or likely conflict if which of the following conditions exist?
a. a commitment of military troops, an executive order, or a perceived threat to U.S. security
b. a public call for military intervention, a decision by the full cabinet, or a commitment of military leadership
c. a vote by the National Security Council, a presidential commitment, or a vote by the House Defense Committee
d. a declaration of war (by Congress), specific statutory authorization by Congress, or a national emergency created by an attack on the United States, its territories, or its armed forces
d. a declaration of war (by Congress), specific statutory authorization by Congress, or a national emergency created by an attack on the United States, its territories, or its armed forces
You might also like to view...
The use of presidential vetoes for reasons of policy disagreement illustrates changing __________ related to the veto powers of the presidency
A)norms B)rules C)regulations D)expectations of formal powers
Which of the following is a difference between liberals and socialists?
A) Socialists have a stronger commitment to egalitarianism than liberals. B) Unlike liberals, socialists advocate active government intervention to protect civil rights. C) Unlike liberals, socialists oppose government redistribution of income. D) Unlike liberals, socialists have zero tolerance for a strong central government. E) Socialists have stronger adherence to traditional social and religious values than liberals.
James Madison played a vital role at the convention because he
A) maintained a personal journal that detailed discussions and votes. B) served as president of the convention and led the meetings. C) secured the room where meetings were held, ensuring discussion would remain private. D) served as a "reporter" relaying each day's events to people waiting outside. E) maintained order during discussion and debates by serving as parliamentarian.
How do supporters of net neutrality defend their position?
What will be an ideal response?