If the claims of an expert turn out to be in error, were you unreasonable in having accepted them in the first place? Why, or why not? Explain your response in a brief essay.
What will be an ideal response?
Answers will vary
You might also like to view...
The following syllogism is guilty of which fallacy?
Ron has either a very strong proposal or a very weak proposal. Ron does not have a very strong proposal. Therefore, Ron has a very weak proposal. a. circular reasoning b. either/or fallacy c. slippery slope d. post hoc ergo propter hoc
A final end is something which is always chosen for its own sake and never for
the sake of something else, according to Aristotle.
Indicate whether the statement is true or false."If So Paulo is the largest city in Illinois, then it is in North America. Thus, if So Paulo is not in North America, then it is not the largest city in Illinois" is a
A) modus tollens B) modus ponens C) contraposition D) hypothetical syllogism E) disjunctive syllogism
By "option" James meant a choice between beliefs that may be proposed to us
a. True b. False