Discuss the pros and cons of illegal immigration in Texas. Should more be done to curtail illegal immigration? Defend your answer.
What will be an ideal response?
An ideal response will:
1. Discuss the advantages of illegal immigration in Texas, including increased labor and taxpayer pools, a cheaper workforce that helps keep prices down, and an increased quality of life for the immigrant.
2. Discuss the disadvantages of illegal immigration, including that the public will have to pay for some social services, that there may be fewer jobs, etc.
3. Evaluate whether more should be done to curtain illegal immigration. Describe what these additional things should be. Defend your answer.
You might also like to view...
The foreign policy process is
a. stable. Virtually all scholars realize that it changes very little from country to country and from time to time. b. well-defined. There is widespread agreement about what the steps in the process are, and about how they must be followed. Most policymakers follow these steps faithfully. c. dynamic. Constant change is a reality of the foreign policy process. d. None of the above statements is true.
Which of the following statements is more likely than the others to be a cause of concern for Republican candidates for office with respect to the Hispanic vote?
a. Most Hispanic Americans are likely to be Catholic. b. Most Hispanic Americans have conservative social values. c. Republican sponsorship and support for laws that crack down on illegal immigrants has been neutralized in some states by their opposition to English-only legislation. d. Hispanics, the fastest-growing ethnic group and largest minority group in the United States, have supported Democrats in recent elections.
According to the text, which statement best reflects the "child's contribution to the risk of being abused"?
-The child has no influence on the risk of being abused. -Children usually invite abuse. -The child's temperament is the main force predicting abuse.
Is this argument valid or invalid?
Consider the following argument: Major premise: If Islam is incompatible with democracy, then Islamic countries are more likely to be dictatorships than democracies. Minor premise: Islamic countries today are more likely to be dictatorships than democracies. Conclusion: Therefore, Islam is incompatible with democracy. A. valid B. invalid