How did the two parties in the first party system view the issues of slavery and black rights?

a. Neither party demonstrated any significant opposition to slavery or concern for black rights.
b. The two parties competed with each other in proclaiming their commitment to the preservation of slavery and their belief that America was a “white man’s country.”
c. The Democratic-Republicans’ egalitarianism led them to oppose slavery and support black rights, whereas the Federalists’ conservatism and respect for property had the opposite effect.
d. Despite the Democratic-Republicans’ professed egalitarianism, Federalists were more generally inclined to oppose slavery and to support black rights.


d. Despite the Democratic-Republicans’ professed egalitarianism, Federalists were more generally inclined to oppose slavery and to support black rights.

History

You might also like to view...

After the __________were pushed back to Iraq and Iran and converted to Islam, the Mamluks were able to terminate the Crusader Kingdom in 1291 with the conquest of Acre.

a. Seljuks b. Marinids c. Mongols d. Fatimids

History

Why did Hamilton seek to deprive Adams of the presidency?

a. He was urged to do so by George Washington. b. He thought Adams would be difficult to manipulate. c. He was a Republican and Adams was a Federalist. d. He thought Adams was not experienced enough to be president.

History

All of the following are characteristic of the monsoon winds of the South Asian subcontinent EXCEPT:

a. The monsoon winds make rainfall seasonally predictable, although even minor variations in timing can cause disasters such as floods and famine. b. During the wet cycle, the winds from Africa, flowing from southwest to northeast, cause heavy rainfall. c. During the dry cycle, the winds reverse and bring hot, dry air from Central Asia, and the subcontinent becomes arid. d. The heaviest rainfall generally occurs in the north and in the plain of Sind, leaving much of the south comparatively arid year round.

History

Compare and contrast progressives and populists. Why were progressives more successful reformers?

What will be an ideal response?

History