The decision in Hague v. C.I.O. (1939) affirmed first the First Amendment right to _________.
A. Freedom of Religion
B. Freedom of Press
C. Freedom of Speech
D. Freedom of Assembly
Ans: D. Freedom of Assembly
The answer is D, Freedom of Assembly. The cased involved the New Jersey Mayor Frank Hague who used a city ordinance to prevent the Committee for Industrial Organization labor meetings in public places. District and Circuit courts ruled in favor of the C.I.O. Hague appealed to the Supreme Court which also ruled against him.
You might also like to view...
Which of the following is NOT a factor affecting a researcher's choice of a field site?
A) substitution - using another similar site B) richness - more interesting data C) suitability - practical issues D) containment - sustained social interaction within a bounded space
Which of the following is an example of tax shifting?
A) As taxes on businesses rise, businesses raise their prices B) As property taxes increase, landlords raise rents C) Businesses making their taxes consumer taxes D) All of these choices are true.
What is the difference between qualitative and quantitative arms agreements?
a. Qualitative agreements are voluntary; quantitative agreements are forced. b. Qualitative agreements restrict types of weapon; quantitative agreements restrict the number of weapons. c. Qualitative agreements are much more likely to work than quantitative agreements. d. Qualitative agreements affect weapon types; quantitative agreements affect troop levels.
Which of the following was a success of the Federal Election Campaign Act?
a. For 20 years, presidential candidates accepted limitations on fund-raising and campaign spending to receive federal matching funds. b. Since the law was passed, virtually all campaign fund-raising and spending has been fully disclosed. c. Since the law was passed, minor parties have had greater success in getting candidates elected. d. For 20 years, challengers in congressional elections have had greater success in getting elected, thanks to limitations on campaign fund-raising and spending.