Shelby hired Evan to drill a well on her property for $3,000 . They both thought the soil and subsoil were normal for the area, but after he started drilling, Evan found a layer of rock that required him to purchase a special drill and required an extra ten hours of work. Evan demanded an extra $1,000 to complete the job. Discuss whether Shelby is liable for the additional $1,000
The general rule is that a promise to do something the promisor is already obligated to do is not consideration. Therefore, under the general rule Shelby would not be liable for the extra $1,000, since Evan was already obligated to drill the well for $3,000 . However, under an exception to the general rule, when unforeseen circumstances cause a party to make a promise regarding an unfinished project, that promise is generally valid consideration. Even though Evan was only promising to finish what he was already obligated to do, his promise to finish the well was valid consideration because neither he nor Shelby knew of the rock and he faced a situation quite different from what the parties anticipated when they entered into the contract.
You might also like to view...
Answer the following statements true (T) or false (F)
1.Families develop rules, beliefs, and rituals in isolation. 2.Every family member, whether living or deceased, is connected to and has the ability to influence others in the family. 3.Family living is a complicated affair, and not all families develop their own patterns. 4.Much of the time, when he has to make a difficulty decision, Alfonso thinks about what his loving grandmother, who passed away last year, would tell him to do. This is because every family member, whether living or deceased, is connected to and has the ability to influence others in the family. 5.Characterizing the national work culture of Japan is easy to do because every worker follows the same patterns of work and communication with superiors.
The fundamental rethinking and redesign of a process to achieve dramatic improvements in efficiency and effectiveness defines __________.
What will be an ideal response?
What does the Delaware antitakeover statute provide? How can an acquirer evade the restrictions imposed by this statute?
What will be an ideal response?
As compared to the internal rate of return (IRR), the net present value (NPV) technique of capital budgeting is considered a better measure of profitability because:
A. the internal rate of return (IRR) does not allow you to determine if the project is acceptable. B. the net present value (NPV) is the only method that allows you to determine which independent project is acceptable. C. the net present value (NPV) technique gives a direct measure of the dollar benefit (on a present value basis) tothe firm's shareholders. D. the internal rate of return (IRR) for a project is different for each firm. E. the net present value (NPV) contains information about a projects "safety margin," which is not inherent in the internal rate of return (IRR).