Why might members or parties engage in a strategy of “strategic disagreement”?
What will be an ideal response?
Strategic disagreement means that members (or parties) might choose to block compromises that they do prefer to the status quo. Strategic disagreement might be preferred if reaching a compromise might alienate supporters, have negative electoral consequences or prevent reaching an even better deal in the future.
You might also like to view...
Most Texans who earn more than $24,000 per year pay a state income tax of 6.25% on their personal income
Indicate whether this statement is true or false.
The identify of Americans and their beliefs in freedom fall under which of the following policy context components?
a. Political b. Administrative c. Economic d. Social and cultural
Pro-life forces in the abortion debate argue that the courts should have the authority to intervene in abortion disputes because the judiciary is independent
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Rational actors in noncooperative games:
a. Do what they think is best in the collective interest, even if doing so is expected to harm them relative to some other action they could have taken b. Do what they think is best in the other player’s interest, even if doing so harms them c. Do what they think is best in their own interest and realize that other players act the same way d. Do what they think is best in their interest knowing that other players prefer the collective good