Explain Wright's contention that goal conflict is desirable
What will be an ideal response?
• An example of goal conflict within the criminal justice system are the due process requirements that may restrict the efficiency of the police.
• According to Wright, goal conflict limits the expression of diverse viewpoints and provides for the mediation of interests so that no single perspective dominates.
• Wright also posits that goal conflict may promote efficiency in offender processing by enhancing the adaptability of the system.
You might also like to view...
Black Lives Matter is a movement that was formed in 2015. It was a direct outcome of ______.
a. protests against white supremacists in Charlottesville, Virginia b. Media attention and public concern about police use of lethal force and deaths of minorities in police custody c. President Obama’s Task Force d. police wearing body cameras
Interstate compacts provide a system whereby a person under supervision can leave the state of conviction – the sending state – and proceed to another state for employment
a. True b. False
According to the textbook, the concept of requiring the violator to make the victim whole is not new, having first appeared in the
a. Code of Hammurabi. b. Ten Commandments. c. Saxony Penal Code. d. Ghirbalidi's luminous.
Does the defendant have a basis for appeal that Smith was on the jury and was predisposed to sentence him to death?
During jury selection in a capital case the following exchange between defense counsel and the potential venire person, Mr. Smith, took place: Attorney: Would you be able to give serious consideration to a sentence or life without parole? Smith: Well, if there's no evidence otherwise, I probably--I mean, I believe in capital punishment, but that's not, I have to be really convinced. That's what I'm saying. Attorney: Are you saying you really have to be convinced by the State, or you really have to be convinced by me? Smith: I would have to be convinced that the person was not deserving of capital punishment. Attorney: Would you require me to put on evidence to persuade you that life imprisonment would be appropriate in this case before you would give serious consideration to a life sentence? Smith: I believe so. Attorney: And you understand that the burden of proof on the state? Smith: Yes. Attorney: But you would nonetheless require us to put on, to convince you otherwise? Smith: Right Attorney: Against the death sentence Smith: Right The defense did not ask the judge to remove Mr. Smith for cause on the basis that Smith could not follow the law placing the burden of proof on the prosecution. Smith remained on the jury and the defendant was sentenced to death. What will be an ideal response?