Does the Supreme Court allow the execution of juvenile inmates?
What will be an ideal response?
The United States is one of the few nations that have executed juvenile offenders. In 2005, in the case of Roper v. Simmons, the Court held that executing those who commit crimes as juveniles is neither consistent with the Constitution nor in keeping with the standards of a civilized society.
You might also like to view...
Report of an explosion with little or no structural damage may be a possible indication of a radiological attack
a. True b. False
______ intervening acts arise when a defendant’s act places a victim in a particular place where the victim is harmed by an unforeseeable event.
a. Proximate b. Coincidental c. Responsive d. Factual
A gang is defined by federal law so that each state can use the same definition.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
Imagine that you are a new actor in a federal court. You are encouraged to think about all of the good you could contribute to on the state and local level. You know that by interpreting the requirements of federal law-especially the U.S. Constitution-the federal courts set the parameters for the operation of the criminal justice system so that police, prosecutors, defense attorneys, and judges honor the individual rights and liberties guaranteed in Constitution throughout all phases of the criminal justice process from the initial investigation by police to sentencing the offender.The Supreme Court, in particular, has a profound impact on the administration of criminal justice. What is an example of such an impact, and what more do you feel that you could be done in the future? As an
actor in a federal court, how can your efforts make their way to the Supreme Court? What will be an ideal response?