Define and discuss the public duty doctrine and its exceptions. What is the rationale for the doctrine and those exceptions? Provide examples
What will be an ideal response?
The public duty doctrine holds that government police officers who fail to prevent
crime while acting within the scope of their official capacity are not liable to specific
individuals for injury or harm that may have been caused by a third party. For
example, the police would not be liable if X was sexually assaulted, Y was murdered,
Z was robbed, or McDonald's was burglarized. Exceptions are based on the special
relationship, where if a duty is owed to a particular person rather than to the general
public, then a police officer or agency that breaches that duty can be held liable.
The rationale for the doctrine and these exceptions is that without the protection of
the public duty doctrine, nobody would ever want to be a police officer because of
possible civil liability every time a crime is committed under the claim of failure to
protect.
You might also like to view...
All of the following statements about "organizational behavior" are true except
a. more police agencies develop strategies that depend upon other individuals to be effective. b. officers identities are often obtained from their work c. the achievement of work related goals are not considered important by police officers d. managers should develop and utilize motivational skills
What are the two primary roles played by the courts in the criminal justice system? Which of the two roles do you believe is the most important?
What will be an ideal response?
Which of the following statements is NOT true regarding discretion?
a. Discretion is required. b. Police resources are unlimited. c. Policing consists of a number of specializations. d. Police are well aware that the other components of the criminal justice network also have limited capacities.
De-escalation specifically involves a permissive style of policing.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)