How would you use the different levels of analysis to explain the causes of the 9/11 terrorist attacks? How useful is the approach of categorizing a typically very complex world in terms of simplified levels of analysis?
What will be an ideal response?
Ideal Answer: The ideal answer should include:
1. Describe the various levels of analysis.
2. Explain how each applicable level of analysis might be applied to the context
and events of 9/11 and the "whys" behind 9/11. For instance, as the individual level of analysis concerns the perceptions, choices, and actions of individual human beings, one might argue that had John Kerry been elected rather than George W. Bush, or had Bill Clinton focused more strongly on issues of terrorism, that 9/11 might have never occurred.
3. Evaluate how effective, or not, the application of levels of analysis is, and perhaps how different contexts allow for more or less effective application.
4. Discuss the level of analysis that is most effective in analysis of the causes of 9/11.
5. Offer a concise summary and effective conclusion.
You might also like to view...
When it was added to the Constitution in 1791, the Bill of Rights __________.
A. applied only to the national government B. applied only to state and local governments C. applied to private individuals and groups D. restricted the activities of state governments
The Constitution has been amended __________ times
a. 10 b. 12 c. 22 d. 27
How does the United States differ from most other world powers?
a. It is neither a parliamentary democracy, nor an executive-dominated government. b. It gives more power to the president than most other democracies. c. It gives less power to the president than most other democracies. d. Unlike parliamentary systems, it is an executive-dominated government.
Is it possible to effectively regulate the role of money in elections? What are the constitutional implications of such regulation?
What will be an ideal response?