Why can plain-view searches be called nonsearches? Identify and describe the situations when the three conditions of the plain-view doctrine apply
What will be an ideal response?
Anything an officer discovers by means of the ordinary senses is not protected by the
Fourth Amendment. Citizens can not realistically have any expectation of privacy in
what they have exposed.
Plain-view searches are really nonsearches because in them, officers discover by
means of their ordinary senses information that citizens have openly exposed to the
public.
According to the text, the plain view doctrine only applies if three conditions are met at
the time evidence is discovered. First, the officers must have a legal right to be where
they are at the time. Second, the officers cannot enhance their ordinary senses with
advanced technology. Finally, the officers' discovery of the evidence to be seized must
be by chance.
You might also like to view...
Probation has typically been regarded as more appropriate for individual white collar offenders than for conventional offenders
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Police arrested Kacy for theft from the electronics section of the local Best Buy store. Video surveillance was not working in that department of Best Buy that day, but Kacy was unaware of what type of system was in use
After the arrest and after being taken to an interrogation room, police asked some questions without offering the Miranda warnings. Police told her that they had video of her taking the two I-Pods from the store without paying for them. Police told her that things would go easier if she just told the truth. Believing that the police had sufficient evidence, Kacy owned up to the larceny. The two officers took a coffee break before returning to the interrogation room. One of the officers said, "By the way, we need you to listen to some warnings we have to give to you before officially asking you any questions." After the Miranda warnings were read, the officers asked if Kacy wanted to talk. She figured that since she had already admitted her criminal involvement in the I-Pod theft, no additional harm could be done by telling it again. On these facts A) both the first and the second interrogations must be excluded consistent with the principles of Miranda v. Arizona. B) only the second interrogation will be admissible since the first session of interrogation violated the principles of Miranda and must be excluded from trial C) both confessions will be admissible since the first session of interrogation was not coercive and the second one involved a proper Miranda warning. D) since the officers acted in good faith to get the truth from Kacy, the principles of Miranda have not been violated. E) C and Dare both correct responses.
Intersubjective agreement is important to which philosophy?
a. Constructivist b. Postpositivist c. Feminist d. Interpretivist
Forensic Information System for Handwriting (F.I.S.H.) is a computerized handwriting database used and maintained by the ______________________________
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word