What is the difference between implied-in-fact and express conditions?
Express conditions are explicitly set forth in language. No particular form is required. Implied-in-fact conditions are similar to express conditions in that they must fully and literally occur and in that the parties understand them to be part of the agreement. They differ in that implied-in-fact conditions are not stated in express language. Rather, they are necessarily inferred from the terms of the contract, the nature of the transaction, or the conduct of the parties.
You might also like to view...
Explain the six areas of organizational control.
What will be an ideal response?
Do college students have a choice in which classes they take to earn a degree? Use what you have learned about the controllable and uncontrollable aspects of marketing in terms of how they might relate to course selection decision-making. Incorporate marketing terms in your response.
What will be an ideal response?
It is reasonable for an HR manager to assume that willful violations of safety and health laws and regulations will result in more severe penalties.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
Canada Clay Ltd., a Canadian company, makes roofing tiles that Don's Asphalt & Tile Inc imports and sells to contractors in the United States. Structures on which the tiles are laid suffer leaks and other weather-related damage. To hold Canada Clay liable requires proof that the tiles were
a. delivered in a safe condition. b. defective when they left Canada Clay's hands. c. mishandled by the contractors. d. substantially changed after they were sold.