What did the U.S. Supreme Court decide in United States v. Virginia (1996 ), also known as the VMI case?
What will be an ideal response?
In United States v. Virginia (1996 ), Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who as a lawyer argued a number of sex discrimination cases before the Court, held that governments must offer an "exceedingly persuasive" justification before they will be allowed to make sex-based distinctions in public policy. Courts generally apply the intermediate scrutiny standard to sex-based discrimination under the Equal Protection Clause.
You might also like to view...
Corporate legal departments use time records
a. to prepare a budget b. for management reports c. to bill clients d. to recover attorneys’ fees e. all of the above
Using the previous example, which of the following is another true statement?
a. Rachel committed the tort of assault against Frank. b. Rachel committed the tort of assault against Kevin. c. Rachel did not commit the tort of assault. d. Both a and b.
Attorney's fees for a divorce, for income tax purposes, ____
a. Are completely deductible b. May be deducted to the extent that the charge was for tax advice. c. May be deducted for any actual court time. d. May not be deducted, although paralegal fees can be.
The basic principle that requires a court to follow a previous decision of a higher court when the current decision involves issues and facts similar to those involved in the previous decision is the doctrine of:
A. precedent. B. concurrent jurisdiction. C. subject matter jurisdiction. D. stare decisis. E. none of the above.