Briefly discuss class dominance theory and what it says about power indicators.
What will be an ideal response?
Ans: Varies. Class dominance theory states that power is concentrated in the hands of a relatively small number of individuals who comprise a power elite. This theory is an extension of Marx’s concept of the bourgeoisie. The bourgeoisie are the elite power class who owns the means of production. This group of people tend to come from similar backgrounds, have similar education, and graduate from the same schools which forms an elite social network. Domhoff states that we can show the existence of the dominant class by answering the power indicator questions: who benefits; who governs; and who wins. Answering these questions allows us to have a better understanding of how power works between social groups.
KEY: Learning Objective: 14.2: Explain theories of state power.
REF: Cognitive Domain: Comprehension
Answer Location: The Conflict Perspective and Class Dominance Theory
Difficulty Level: Medium
You might also like to view...
In centuries past, with respect to dying ________
a. people avoided discussing death. b. people refused to accept the reality of their own death. c. people were more familiar with death than they are today. d. All of these responses are correct.
According to exchange theorists, what happens when one party in an association cannot offer comparable returns? Select all, but only those that apply.
a. People can force other people to help them. b. People can attempt to get along without what they need from the others. c. People can subordinate themselves to the others. d. People will maintain relationships without rewards in the hopes they will pay dividends in the long term.
Which of the following statements is true of a family crisis?
A) It requires that the responses to the stressor remain unchanged. B) It upsets the normal functioning of the family. C) The greater the number of crisis events, the lesser the stress. D) An extramarital affair is an external source of family crisis.
Should older perpetrators of crimes be treated differently from others because of their age? Is it important to incarcerate an 80-year-old who has committed a serious crime, or should he or she experience a different type of punishment? If we treat an 80-year-old differently, what about a 75-year-old? Or a 65-year-old? Where should the chronologicalcutoff be for a different prison experience?
What will be an ideal response?