How do governments affect the distribution of wealth in a society? Are certain methods considered more legitimate than others? Explain.
What will be an ideal response?
The ideal answer should include:
1. What is private and what is public can depend on the government.
2. The United States is a capitalist system, which emphasizes private ownership of the economy. Nonetheless, the government can affect the distribution of wealth in a society by placing higher taxes on those with higher incomes and/or providing welfare programs to people who are getting the least of society's wealth.
3. Relying on such free-market measures tends to be seen as more legitimate.
You might also like to view...
Which of the following is an example of symbolic speech?
a. shouting "fire" in a crowded theater b. flag burning c. political commentary on the evening news d. libel e. child pornography
The United States is the largest contributor to the UN
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
The Clean Air Act of 1970 restricted tailpipe pollutants
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
The fewer chambers a legislature has, the ______.
a. harder it is to achieve consensus on public policy b. less democratic it is c. more representative it is of the people as a whole d. more weight it gives to elite opinion e. slower it is to react to crises