Did your problem-solving process lead you to the correct answer? If not, where did the process break down or lead you astray? How can you revise your approach to produce a more desirable result?
What will be an ideal response?
This question asked you to apply the definitions of reductionist reasoning to a specific example. If
you got the correct answer, great job! If you got an incorrect answer, where did the process break down?
Did you forget the definitions of deductive and inductive reasoning? Did you not realize the that taking
something apart to figure out how it works is reductionism?
You might also like to view...
Which of the following allows groups of skeletal muscle cells to perform coordinated contractions? (2 points)
a. Their sarcolemma is fused to the tendons, allowing them to function without continual nerve stimulation. b. Their cells are branched and joined end to end, allowing them to function without continual nerve stimulation. c. They contain a complex network of striations, allowing more efficient cell-to-cell communication d. They are connected into multinucleate tissues, allowing more efficient cell-to-cell communication.
The developmental fate of each cell is determined by chemical interactions among cells in a process called ________
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
In an average ecosystem, about how much energy is present in the organisms at a given trophic level compared to the organisms at the next higher trophic level?
A) a tenth as much B) half as much C) twice as much D) ten times as much
The damage caused by mismatched blood transfusions results from the activation of (antibody/complement/histamine) proteins
What will be an ideal response?