In what ways might press reports and news coverage create problems for the criminal justice system and be damaging to the objective outcome of a criminal trial? What methods do judges have deal with the media to ensure the defendant receives a fair trial
and an impartial jury?
What will be an ideal response?
Answers should explain the ways in which press reports often create problems for the criminal justice system at all states of a criminal investigation. Answers should also focus on how pretrial publicity may impact the ability of the court to find jurors who have not already formed an opinion regarding the defendant's guilt or innocence and how new reports from the courtroom may create confusion among jurors. The legality of gag orders and alternative methods available to judges to deal with pretrial publicity should also be discussed.
You might also like to view...
The Supreme Court held that a violation of Miranda does not require the suppression of the "physical fruits" of the statement, only the nonuse of the actual statement in the case of
a. United States v. Patane b. Minnick v. Mississippi ' c. Arizona v. Robertson d. New York v. Quarles
If a prosecutor decided not to try the case of a first-time offender who had only caused minor harm to the victim, what would have affected this discretion?
A. Victim issues B. Extralegal issues C. Legal issues D. Resource issues
There can be significant differences in the goals and styles of chiefprosecution from one jurisdiction to the next
a. True b. False
According to this rule, a suspect who, during a frisk, which is not justified by proper observation and reasonable suspicion , is found to be carrying drugs or weapons can seek to have the evidence excluded
a. totality of circumstances b. probable cause c. exigent circumstances d. exclusionary rule e. due process