What did the Supreme Court decide in Loving v. Virginia (1967)? How could advocates of same-sex marriage use this case as a model?
Answer:
An ideal response will:
1. Explain that the Supreme Court's decision in Loving v. Virginia ruled unconstitutional all laws that restrict marriage based solely on race.
2. Note that this decision hinged on the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause.
3. Explain how a similar argument could be made that bans on same-sex marriage are unconstitutional.
You might also like to view...
Why did Syria ally with Iran during the Iran-Iraq War?
a. To balance against the growing power of Iraq b. Because it shared the same ideology as Iran c. Because Iraq had openly threatened Syria's borders d. To bandwagon with Iran, which Syrians believed was the more powerful state e. Because most other states were also supporting Iran
America's government institutions and its political system developed within a framework of
A) federalism. B) unification of powers. C) lawlessness. D) equality of result. E) complete freedom.
In which case might a Presidential System have fewer veto points than a Parliamentary system?
a. Presidential systems will always have fewer veto points than Parliamentary systems. b. A Presidential system with one party controlling the presidency and another controlling both houses of a bicameral legislature and a Parliamentary system with a coalition government c. A Presidential system with one party controlling the presidency and one both house of a bicameral legislature and a Parliamentary system with a clear majority government d. A Presidential system with one party controlling the presidency and both houses of a bicameral legislature and a Parliamentary system with a coalition government e. A Presidential system will never have fewer veto points than a Parliamentary system.
Which of the following statements about religious freedom in the United States today is LEAST accurate?
A. The Supreme Court upholds legislation that restricts religious practices that pose a threat to the safety of the general public. B. The U.S. government has traditionally distinguished between religious beliefs, which are inviolable, and religious actions, which may be circumscribed. C. In recent years, Congress has been more willing than the Supreme Court to support individuals' freedom of religious expression. D. The Supreme Court sometimes rules against religious practices if they might harm the health of the practitioners. E. Congress can ban unpopular religious practices as long as it directs that ban against a specific religious group.