One goal of social policy is to raise the quality of life for all citizens. How does the federal government meet that goal? What kinds of programs help all citizens, instead of just those in a certain category?
How might categorical programs also be of help to all citizens?
Answer:
An ideal response will:
1. Describe various programs that improve the quality of life for all citizens, such as environmental programs that improve air and water quality; programs to build roads, bridges, and parks; regulating air traffic and improving national security; fighting crime and terrorism; and strengthening schools.
2. Discuss how categorical programs can be seen as helping all citizens. Answers will vary, but students might note that these programs provide a social safety net for citizens in need and, given the right set of circumstances, all citizen could find themselves in need of help at some time; and they may identify the idea behind Lyndon Johnson's Great Society agenda that all of society benefits from improved education, the elimination of poverty, and so on.
You might also like to view...
Which of the following best describes the term majoritarian voting?
a. A third-party candidate receives a majority of the votes. b. The pressure to conform to one's political party when voting. c. The candidate wins only with the support of a majority of voters. d. The candidate with most votes wins, regardless of majority.
Especially aggressive and strict forms of law enforcement will likely cut down on crime; however, what is another unintended impact of such a policy?
a. Police officers tend to be injured. b. Police officers begin to act like a military force. c. The cost to taxpayers is high and law-abiding citizens lose some of their individual freedoms as well. d. Innocent people are found guilty. e. Too many people go to prison.
Since 1990, the Supreme Court has consistently expanded the power of Congress to regulate interstate commerce
Indicate whether this statement is true or false?
What are the potential problems associated with a constitution that can be amended too easily?
What will be an ideal response?