According to the liberal perspective, why did the Oslo Accords fail?
What will be an ideal response?
Varies. The liberal perspective offers several explanations for why the Oslo Accords failed. First, it might have been due to the diplomatic inflexibility of leaders like Yasser Arafat. Second, it might have been because the government coalition in Israel shifted to empower groups that opposed negotiations. Third, it might have been an interaction between Israeli and Palestinian extremism, with one causing the other to increase, and vice versa. Fourth, it might have been caused by the fact that the Oslo Accords did little to improve the economic prospects of the Middle East. Fifth, it might have been because the great powers (in particular, the United States) had other diplomatic priorities.
You might also like to view...
All of the following were keys to adoption of constitutional change in various states EXCEPT:
a. Thorough groundwork by a respected study commission. b. Avoiding allowing the process to fall into the trap of partisanship. c. Making sure there was no election coming up so that potential candidates would not be afraid to support the changes. d. Avoiding making unnecessary enemies by steering clear of emotional issues that may not be central to fundamental objectives.
Policy change refers to modification of policies after evaluation
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Which of the following can affect not only what is allowable and what is not, but also how cases are judged at the state level?
a. Where you are physically located. b. Established legal codes. c. Whether a Constitutional issue is involved. d. Whether diversity of citizenship is involved.
What has been the long-term trend with respect to the growth, power, and structure of the institutional office of the presidency, and what predictions could you make about the future of the institutional presidency?
Include examples in your answer to support your claims.