Roscoe is building a new home. After hours, he invites his friend Jacob to see the home which is in a state of partial construction. While visiting, a roof tile falls from the roof and injures Jacob. Jacob sues the roofing contractor, RoofCo, alleging negligence under a theory of res ipsa loquitur. RoofCo employees were the only ones on the roof earlier that day. In his suit, Roscoe:
a. Will likely not prevail on a theory of res ipsa loquitur because roof tiles regularly fall off roofs without anyone being negligent.
b. Will likely not prevail on a theory of res ipsa loquitur because Jacob should have anticipated a roof tile would fall on him.
c. Will likely not prevail on the theory of res ipsa loquitur because there is no evidence RoofCo was in exclusive control of the roof.
d. Will likely prevail on the theory of res ipsa loquitur because all elements of res ipsa loquitur appear to have been met.
D
You might also like to view...
A delegation may be violative of the Constitution if it places control over an essential function of one branch in another branch
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
The Rowe test includes all of the following factors except
a. the amount in controversy. b. the specificity of the discovery request. c. relevancy. d. cost
While confinement is a key element for the tort of false imprisonment, that element is negated by:
a. Plaintiff's knowledge of a reasonable means of escape. b. The confinement is only for a short duration. c. The confinement is in a large, comfortable area. d. Others are also confined keeping the plaintiff company.
Which of the following would be considered child abuse?
A. Neglecting a child B. Molesting a child C. Injuring a child D. All of these choice are correct.