In_________, the Supreme Court chipped away at the McCain-Feingold Act by invalidating a section of the act known as the "millionaire's amendment."
a. Randall v. Sorrell (2006)
b. Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. (2007)
c. Davis v. Federal Election Commission (2008)
d. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010)
C
You might also like to view...
Reprisals are actions that would have been __________ under international law, but which may be __________ if taken in response to the __________ actions of another state.
A. illegal; illegal; illegal B. legal; illegal; illegal C. illegal; legal; illegal D. legal; legal; illegal
_________ are expenditures that are not coordinated with a candidate's campaign or a political party.
A. Bundled expenditures B. Dispersed costs C. Concentrated costs D. Independent expenditures
Which of the following is most likely to happen when an electoral candidate, to gain popularity, claims that all the polls show that he or she is ahead in the race?
A) All the other candidates will form a partnership with this candidate to increase the voter turnout. B) Journalists are likely to participate in rallies to raise a voice against such false declarations. C) The candidate will be banned from contesting the elections. D) The turnover at the voting booths will increase. E) People who want to support the winner will back this candidate despite their true feelings.
The fundamental difference between the influence campaign in the 2016 election and other concerted attempts by politicians to influence how the American electorate think is that in 2016 the influence was
A.) done by a hostile foreign government B.) done without a particular candidate or idea in mind C.) not at all successful at changing people's mind D.) not as sophisticated as other attempts like The Federalist Papers