What is the central difference between the free market policies that exacerbate inequality and the capabilities of the pan-ethnic movements that George Lipsitz believes could have a greater effect on positive societal change?
A. Pan-ethnic movements are able to garner greater support through inclusion, which will in turn affect elections and policy changes, while free market policies remain possessively invested in whiteness.
B. Pan-ethnic movements use society’s investment in whiteness to promote white leaders who support positive change, while free market policy supporters actively suppress these leaders.
C. Pan-ethnic movements can acknowledge and combat the power of whiteness that intensifies inequality, while free market policies continue to allow for possessive investment in whiteness by ignoring the unequal power of whiteness.
D. Pan-ethnic movements seek to recycle free-market policies into more positive government efforts to decrease inequality, while the original policies themselves remain fundamentally invested in whiteness.
C. Pan-ethnic movements can acknowledge and combat the power of whiteness that intensifies inequality, while free market policies continue to allow for possessive investment in whiteness by ignoring the unequal power of whiteness.
You might also like to view...
In 1997, lawmakers dedicated lottery revenue to __________
a. the general fund b. public education c. children's health insurance d. correctional services
Cases reach the Texas Supreme Court primarily on __________.
A. petitions for review B. writs of mandamus C. petitions for acceptance D. de novo writs
Discuss the role the Texas Grange played in formulating the Texas constitution of 1876, its members' main goals, and the reasons they sought these goals.
What will be an ideal response?
Which of the following is not likely to prefer the weak governor system in Texas?
a. Special interest groups b. Legislative leaders c. The governor d. Bureaucrats e. The general public