Under the domesticated animal rule, an owner or caretaker can be held strictly liable for any harm to others the animal causes
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
false
You might also like to view...
Mr. Brown is unhappy with the settlement he received when represented by the Garrod Law Offices. He thinks that he should have had an opportunity to have his day in court and have a trial like those he has seen on television. Mr. Brown feels that if he had had a chance to have a jury of his peers, he would have won more. What would be his best approach to address his concern?
A. He can file a complaint or grievance with a grievance or disciplinary committee. B. He will need to seek an interlocutory appeal from the state's highest court. C. He can sue the Garrod Law Office, going pro se, if necessary. D. Nothing. By accepting the settlement, he's waived his right to complain.
In Kelo v. City of New London, Connecticut, the court held that?
A. ?eminent domain was unconstitutional because some of the benefits went to private individuals. B. ?public purpose was narrowly defined and eminent domain was unconstitutional because the property would not be put to public use. C. ?the taking of Kelo's property was appropriate under the city's eminent domain power because the development plan was for a public purpose. D. ?it was unconstitutional for a state to allow the power of eminent domain to be used to satisfy a development plan.
A cooperation agreement:
A) is the same as use immunity B) is the same as transactional immunity C) lays out how the defendant will testify in exchange for a recommendation of leniency. D) circumvents attorney-client privilege. E) none of the above
The following is true about digests:
A. A federal digest may be used to find relevant cases decided by the federal courts B. A state digest may be used to find relevant cases decided by the courts of the state C. Digests are updated by annual pocket parts and by paperbound supplementary pamphlets. D. a and b E. a, b, and c