What are the merits and demerits of unemployment compensation as a built-in stabilizer? Can you think of any changes in unemployment compensation that might improve its effectiveness as a stabilizing technique?

What will be an ideal response?


The merits of unemployment compensation as a built-in stabilizer are that it provides a source of income and spending power during a period when eligible workers would have otherwise lost their regular source of income. It provides security during a period of temporary layoffs, or during the period of job-search. The demerits are primarily related to the probable loss in work incentives that result. To the extent that workers can live on their unemployment benefits, they have less incentive to engage in productive work and may prolong their job search.
Any changes that provide more assistance, encouragement, and incentives for unemployed workers to engage in productive work during recessionary periods would enhance the stabilizing power of unemployment compensation. Such policies as requiring the unemployed to register for work and to provide assistance with job-seeking and training programs to upgrade skills would be examples of policies that add to the automatic stabilizing effect of unemployment insurance.

Economics

You might also like to view...

Refer to the scenario above. What is the probability of picking a red ball from the box?

A) 24.65% B) 45% C) 50% D) 64%

Economics

Which of the following is the primary source of cross-country differences in the real earnings of workers?

a. differences in natural resource endowments b. differences in the share of workers that are members of a labor union c. differences in output per worker d. access to modern technology e. differences in the average number of hours worked

Economics

Demand for a food item increases by more than the supply of the food item. One thing for certain is that

A) the price of the food item rises. B) income elasticity of demand (for the food item) is greater than 1. C) the supply curve is price elastic. D) real income rises as a result. E) none of the above

Economics

The strategy to respond in kind to a competitor is called a tit-for-tat strategy.

Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)

Economics