Alex sues Lisa for $60,000 for damages suffered as a result of her negligence because she failed to place a sign on the door of her restaurant warning customers to "Watch Your Step" as they exited the building. A jury awards Alex $40,000 because Alex's intoxication made him 33% responsible for his injuries. Lisa avoided full liability because she showed:
a. comparative negligence
b. intoxicating negligence
c. intervening conduct
d. assumption of risk
e. evil intent
a
You might also like to view...
Which conflict-handling style is at greatest risk of alienating group members and violating their trust?
a. avoiding b. dominating c. obliging d. integrating
Too many font choices on the same page can leave a document looking ________________
a. incomplete b. exotic c. cluttered d. unimportant
Given the following gasoline data:
Quarter Year 1 Year 2 1 150 156 2 140 148 3 185 201 4 160 174 (a) Compute the seasonal index for each quarter. (b) Suppose we expect year 3 to have annual demand of 800. What is the forecast value for each quarter in year 3?
The doctrine that protects judges from suits for damages for judicial acts is called:
a. the doctrine of judicial worth b. the doctrine of judicial privilege c. the doctrine of judicial knowledge d. the doctrine of judicial immunity e. the doctrine of judicial cause