Are there any evolutionarily advantageous consequences for our species, given that human dominance structuring is a natural phenomenon?
What will be an ideal response
Yes. Once we commit to a given decision option, we gain confidence that our choice was the best one available and that the other options would have been mistakes. With confidence in the choice we have made, we are able to take action and to persevere during difficulties. We would hardly be able to accomplish anything were we to constantly reconsider every decision and change our minds. Our natural tendency toward dominance structuring helps us to be resolute and to sustain our commitments in the face of adversity, risk, and uncertainty. The natural culling out those who could not sustain their decisions in such circumstances has created evolutionary advantages for our species.
You might also like to view...
Whether the military innovation would be worth much to Ben’s employer is
a. A factual issue b. A conceptual issue c. A moral issue d. An application issue
"Archetype" is another word for "ideal."
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Which feature of emotivism makes it different from subjective relativism?
a. In emotivism, moral judgments vary from individual to individual. b. In emotivism, some of our feelings about actions are objectively justified. c. In emotivism, we are not able to have disagreements in our moral beliefs. d. In emotivism, we do not automatically have true beliefs about right and wrong.
Corporate Executive, Disasters and Moral Responsibility
What would be your main and supporting claims on this?