In the past few decades, what manners have states developed to resist the increased authority of the national government?
What will be an ideal response?
While student answers to this question will vary, they should cite many of the following. First, states have been increasingly taxing e-commerce that had traditionally been outside of their state boundaries. Second, they’ve engaged in interstate lobbying to influence national policymakers on issues of importance to them through, for instance, the National Governors Association, the National Conference of State Legislatures, and the National League of Cities. Third, states have delayed or altered implementation especially of unfunded mandates and categorical grants. Fourth, they have passed non-binding state sovereignty resolutions. Fifth, they have brought the federal government to court, e.g. in United States v. Lopez (1995) and Printz v. United States (1997).
You might also like to view...
County courts are the basic trial courts of the state of Texas, hearing all felony cases and civil disputes involving relatively large amounts of money
Indicate whether this statement is true or false.
A basic recommendation of "supply-side economics" is:
A. decrease the budget deficit to raise interest rates B. cut taxes to increase investment and employment C. government should focus its spending on the military rather than on income support D. an increase in supply will cause a decrease in demand
Which of the following is not a primary function of the Texas attorney general?
A) Representing the state in conflicts with the national government B) Representing the state in legal conflicts with governments of other states C) Prosecuting the most criminal cases in Texas D) Initiating lawsuits against corporations for consumer protection
The European Union (EU) is an example of a __________.
A. nongovernmental organization B. confederation C. unitary state D. multinational state