Explain mixed methods research in comparative politics
What will be an ideal response?
Comparative politics research is almost never conducted in a laboratory, with controlled conditions that would give us an unimpeachable answer to our question. Today, scholars often employ mixed methods approaches, using both quantitative and qualitative techniques, in an effort to build convincing claims about the relationships between attributes and outcomes. The best we can do is look for cases that are as similar as possible on certain variables and as different as possible on other variables, and then build an argument about the implications of such differences and similarities.
You might also like to view...
Which of the following agencies is available to aid the president in conducting foreign affairs?
A) the National Security Council B) the State Department C) the Pentagon D) all of the above E) none of the above
Answer the following statement(s) true (T) or false (F)
1. Party-line voting is much more common today than it was in the 1970s. 2. Members are more likely to vote with their party leaders on final passage votes rather than procedural matters. 3. About half the members of each subcommittee tend to be actively involved in committee work such as hearings and markup sessions. 4. Presidents almost always prevail in persuading members of Congress to pass legislation important to them. 5. The Agriculture Committee is the most biased toward members with a constituency stake in the legislation being considered.
Robert Dahl described New Haven, Connecticut, as a community with
a. too many competing government jurisdictions. b. a power elite. c. a small-town orientation. d. a variety of power centers, with no single one in control.
Laws in the United States are based largely on the
A) doctrines of Friedrich Engels, a German philosopher. B) ideas of Thomas Paine, an American patriot and legal scholar. C) laws during the time of the republic in the Roman Empire. D) English common-law tradition. E) Bible.