Should the good faith exception to search and seizure violations be eliminated? Does it matter that the good faith exception allows for constitutional violations to go unpunished?
What will be an ideal response?
Good answers will cover the definitions of the good faith exception and then analyze whether it matters that the exception allows the use of evidence that is illegally obtained. This question requires taking a position on the arguments for or against the exclusionary rule and defending the position.
You might also like to view...
A(n) ________ is a place that erects barriers to social interchange with the world at large.
A. open institution B. total institution C. closed institution D. reception center
The losing party in the lower court has an unlimited amount of time to file an appeal.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
Insanity is a medical term, not a legal one.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
The Mafia originated in ___________ around 1860, and started as a criminal gang employed by wealthy landowners to function as agents of social and land control
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word