Answer the following statement(s) true (T) or false (F)
1. In an argument by analogy, the more relevant dissimilarities there are between the objects being compared, the less likely the conclusion is to be true.
2. When comparing two objects—A and B—to the extent that things (other than A) relevantly similar to B lack the property in question, the analogy between A and B breaks down.
3. In an argument by analogy, the more relevant similarities between the objects being compared, the weaker the analogy.
4. The tautologies of statement logic have a probability of one.
5. The probability of A • ~A is greater than zero.
1. TRUE
2. TRUE
3. FALSE
4. TRUE
5. FALSE
You might also like to view...
Identify any fallacies in the following passage either by naming them or, where they seem not to conform to any of the patterns described in the text, by giving a brief explanation of why the fallacious reasoning is irrelevant to the point at issue.Did Amundsen beat Scott to the South Pole? Hardly, sir! 'Twould be disastrous indeed for the Empire if we allowed ourselves to believe Norwegians with dogs could ever best red-blooded English males!
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
Translate the following into a standard-form categorical claim: Whenever Tony plays the accordion, people leave.
What will be an ideal response?
Which of the following are both intensional definitions?
A) Demonstrative definition, operational definition. B) Definition by genus and difference, ostensive definition. C) Etymological definition, demonstrative definition. D) Definition by subclass, definition by genus and difference. E) Operational definition, synonymous definition.
What are the two ways that a belief can fall short on knowledge?
What will be an ideal response?