Assess the 21-foot rule and its limitations.
What will be an ideal response?
The basic premise of the 21-foot rule, also known as the edged-weapon rule, is that a subject may pose a significant threat to a person when they are within 21 feet of the officer. The reasoning behind this theory is that a subject can cover 21 feet in the 1.5–2.0 s it would take for an officer to unholster, aim, and fire his gun. The biggest concern with the 21-foot rule is that it does not take in to consideration any factor other than distance. Obviously, not everyone within 21 feet of an officer poses the same risk. A potential threat does not necessarily mean the subject is an actual threat. The rule does not account for any other subject characteristics nor does it consider any officer-related factors. Finally, the rule does not account for environmental conditions. Closing 21 feet on dry land is much easier than closing 21 feet on ice. As such, the rule must be used as a guideline only and not a steadfast rule.
You might also like to view...
_______________________ is the use of intentional fake bidding on the part of the seller in order to artificially inflate an item's auctioned price
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
Young people face a much higher rate of victimization than older people, especially before the age of 25.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
Which of the following is the best example of a self-evaluation (self-appraisal) during an assessment?
a. a police officer completing a written document regarding number of citizen contacts in the last week b. an officer verbally telling his or her supervisor that he or she will complete a self-assessment tool in the next week c. a police chief filling out a questionnaire meant for one of his or her officers in order to save time d. an officer and his or her supervisor sitting down together to complete a self-evaluation
Exposure to the stress of combat is associated with an elevated risk of criminal behavior
a. True b. False