Affirming the consequent is a fallacy that can happen when using conditional reasoning. An example would be
a. “If a student studies child development, s/he is smart. Hanna does not study child development. Therefore, she is not smart.”
b. “If a student studies child development, s/he is smart. Hanna is smart. Therefore, she studies child development.”
c. “If a student studies child development, s/he is smart. Hanna studies child development. Therefore, she is smart.”
d. “If a student studies child development, s/he is smart. Hanna is not smart. Therefore, she does not study child development.”
Ans: b
You might also like to view...
Marijuana decreases the release of both excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitters
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Physical cravings for a drug and unpleasant reactions when the drug is withheld are signs of
a. drug tolerance. b. psychological dependence. c. emotional dependence. d. physical dependence.
Which statement about the socialization of aggression in boys and girls is FALSE?
a. Parents play rougher with sons than with daughters. b. Parents discourage daughters' aggression more than sons' aggression. c. Physically rough play is part of the androgynous gender role. d. Aggressive themes are more common in toys given to boys than in those given to girls.
A man has developed a sense of personal identity, has been successful in establishing a career, and has been happily married for eight years. If he is like most other men, at this point in his life he is probably asking himself this question:
a. "Can I trust others in this world?" b. "Who am I?" c. "In what ways can I contribute to others?" d. "Has my life been truly satisfying?"