Our client has believed himself to be the father of a child for three years. He has lived with the child and the mother since she was four months pregnant, but a recent health issue has demonstrated he cannot be the child's biological father. He and the child's mother were not in an exclusive relationship at the time of conception (she says she has no way of tracing any other possible "father"), so he has always known this was a possibility. He didn't care-he loves "his son." However, things are tense with the mother right now. What can he do to preserve his rights as a father?
What will be an ideal response?
He has several options. Although he may qualify as a de facto father, given the length of time he has assumed paternal duties, we might encourage him to file an affidavit of paternity. There is no indication that there is another man claiming the position, so it is possible that even if he and the mother split up, he will remain the father is he chooses to do so. If they do separate, he can seek custody rights then. If someone challenges him for paternity, THAT would be the time to raise the de facto issue.
You might also like to view...
Which level of planning typically looks out 3–5 years, which is more than other shorter-range planning levels?
A. strategic B. operational C. tactical D. departmental
When transferring real estate assets, it is the responsibility of the paralegal to prepare the Report of Sale of Land at Private Sale Under Order for Sale.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
In District of Columbia v. Heller, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that:
A) the District of Columbia could have an absolute prohibition on handguns. B) the Second Amendment protects the individual right to bear arms. C) state and local governments may not pass any law restricting handgun usage. D) U.S. citizens could openly carry handguns anywhere. E) all of the above
What three things would a plaintiff who wanted to use the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur have to prove?
What will be an ideal response?