Compare the trespass doctrine with the privacy doctrine in defining Fourth Amendment searches
What will be an ideal response?
Until the late 1960s, SCOTUS defined searches under what was called the trespass doctrine. According to this doctrine, to be a search, officers had to physically invade a "constitutionally protected area.". Constitutionally protected areas were the places named specifically in the Fourth Amendment: persons, houses, papers, and effects. Nontangible items not falling within the places named in the Fourth Amendment were not protected under the trespass doctrine.
In Katz v. U.S. (1967), SCOTUS established the privacy doctrine. According to this doctrine, the Fourth Amendment protects persons whenever the persons have an expectation of privacy that society is prepared to recognize as reasonable. Thus, under this doctrine, SCOTUS decided that a telephone conversation could be the subject of an unreasonable search and seizure, a position previously rejected by the trespass doctrine. The privacy doctrine thus enhanced the already established right to privacy in a "constitutionally protected area.".
You might also like to view...
Harris v. New York held that admissions made without proper Miranda warnings being administered could be introduced into evidence to _________________ a defendant who testifies at his trial
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
Considered an invisible epidemic, ____________________ and ____________________ misuse is thought to affect 17 percent of older adults
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
The _________ ___________of the United States is the administrative policymaking organization of the federal judicial system
Fill in the blanks with correct word
The norms of the peer culture are often at odds with those of adult society, and a _____ with a distinct social system develops
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word