Ever since the Miranda decision, there has been debate about whether Miranda's warnings are constitutionally mandated. How has the Supreme Court addressed that issue in recent years?
What will be an ideal response?
In 2000, the Supreme Court in Dickerson v. United States settled the matter by holding that Miranda was a constitutional decision. In doing so, it rejected the notion expressed in Michigan v. Tucker (1974) that a Miranda violation is not actually a violation of a constitutional right and confirmed that the U.S. Constitution requires that Miranda procedures be followed. Since Dickerson, it is clear that Miranda's requirements must still be followed by state and federal law enforcement professionals.
You might also like to view...
The National Youth Gang Survey is an example of official data
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
According to Warshaw, potential rape victims should try to break the man's notion that this act is a seductive process
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
According to the alien conspiracy model, U.S. organized crime is controlled by a small group of _____ families
a. Irish b. Italian c. African-American d. German
Age of gang members is an important dimension of gang profiles
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.