Opponents of judicial restraint argue that its adherents in the U.S. Supreme Court sometimes allow
a. too little power for states
b. too much influence by conservative judges
c. injustices to fester for too long in society
d. too much leeway to make the law from the bench
e. cases to languish too long in the court system
c
You might also like to view...
Elections in ordinary times are critical because they often produce major party realignments
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Discuss how Texas regulates interest groups.
What will be an ideal response?
If the government’s offer is rejected by hard-liners, then __________________.
a. The government will have to offer a more generous deal. b. The government will repress all the terrorists. c. The moderates will reject the deal too. d. The moderates can still uphold their part of the deal.
When an interest group representing teachers lobbies a state legislature for an increase in retirement benefits, it is seeking to provide its members with ________ benefits.
A. ethical B. moral C. purposive D. solidary E. economic