In researching a proposal to expand your division, you find evidence that does not support your line of reasoning. Should you include it in your report? Why or why not?
What will be an ideal response?
Answer: Yes, you should include it. Although you want to be as brief as possible, your readers need a minimum amount of information before they can grasp the issue being presented. Omitting relevant information or facts can bias your report.
Present all sides of the issue fairly and equitably and include all the essential information, even if some of the information doesn't support your line of reasoning. Omitting relevant information or facts can bias your report.
You might also like to view...
This question contains three parts; be sure to answer all parts. First, define a need-based perspective on motivation. Second, identify two of the need-based theories, and list the needs that each includes. Finally, assume that you are the CEO of a company that manufactures low-priced clothing for bargain retailers like Walmart and Target. For the two theories you listed, explain how you would manage each of the relevant needs for the employees in your factory, where the cloth is cut, and the clothes are assembled.
What will be an ideal response?
Fast-food companies shifting to more ethically sourced ingredients such as cage-free eggs are an example of what strategy?
a. low-price provider b. differentiation c. market niche d. competitive pricing
Although the U.S. supports free trade, since 1789 it has supported tariffs to protect domestic
A. wheat. B. sugar. C. corn. D. palm oil.
The net present value and internal rate of return methods of decision making in capital budgeting are superior to the payback method in that they
a. are easier to implement. b. consider the time value of money. c. require less input. d. reflect the effects of sensitivity analysis.