In Spanish Broadcasting v. Clear Channel, where Spanish sued Clear for monopolization of the Spanish- language radio market because it owned a share of Hispanic Broadcasting, a large Spanish-language radio chain, the court held that the:
a. case failed because Spanish could not show evidence of anticompetitive conduct
b. two companies acted "in concert" to try to damage Spanish's market position, thereby violating the ShermanAct
c. two companies controlled a dominant share of the market and used their power to reduce the ability ofSpanish to obtain sponsors, thereby violating the Sherman Act
d. relationship was monopolization and Clear had to sell its interest in Hispanic e. none of the other choices
a
You might also like to view...
What are important considerations that will result in a successful global strategic alliance between two countries?
What will be an ideal response?
M & N Enterprises uses strict route designs for its large sales team. M & N most likely wants to:
A. ensure the safety of salespeople. B. eliminate overnight travel. C. improve territory coverage. D. establish performance goals. E. reduce vacation time.
In the process of preparing department income statements, a company uses there are three steps before the statements can be completed. Describe those steps.
What will be an ideal response?
Cumulative voting allows a greater control by the management interests of a corporation
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false