Jose, who had been arrested for a robbery, had been advised by a detective in accordance with the requirements of the Miranda warnings that he was not obligated to answer any questions and that he could remain silent if he wished

Question

Jose made a written acknowledgment that he had received the Miranda warnings and declined to discuss the robbery. The police officers involved immediately ceased efforts at interrogation. Several hours later, after giving new Miranda warnings, a different officer, a detective, questioned Jose solely about an unrelated murder. Jose made incriminating statements about the murder. The second round of interrogation initiated by the detective concerning the murder
A) violated the spirit of the Miranda warnings because Jose had not yet spoken with his attorney.
B) violated the requirements under Miranda because Jose indicated desire not to speak with police about the robbery.
C) does not deviate from Miranda principles since there is a duty on the arrestee to notify any second interrogators what he has told earlier interrogators, and there is no evidence that Jose told the detective about his earlier conversations.
D) did not run afoul of the Miranda principles because the police honored Jose's request not to speak with them, and the second set of officers were simply unaware that Jose did not wish to talk to police officers when they asked him to speak with them.
E) did not run afoul of the Miranda principles because the police honored Jose's request not to speak with them concerning the robbery and the second interrogation involved a different officer for a totally separate crime for which Miranda warnings were properly given.

Answer 1

E