?A concurring opinion is when
A. ?one or more judges deciding a case agree with the decision of the majority but wish to provide different reasons to support the decision.
B. ?one or more judges deciding a case disagree with the decision of the majority and wish to provide reasons to discredit the decision.
C. ?one judge does not agree with the majority.
D. ?more than two judges do not agree with the majority.
Answer: A
You might also like to view...
Regarding the unauthorized practice of law, what factors do courts NOT consider when determining if a paralegal was "practicing law"??
A. ?Did the paralegal represent a client in a court proceeding? B. ?Did the paralegal prepare documents without attorney supervision? C. ?Did the paralegal give legal advice to a client? D. ?Did the paralegal at some point merely talk to the client without a lawyer present? E. ?None of the above
Judges should
A. take community opinion into consideration when rendering decisions B. investigate witnesses if counsel fails to do so C. provide the court with dignity, fairness and efficiency D. never recuse themselves
a. surrogacy b. exculpatory c. prenuptial agreement d. pari delicto e. usury f. Sunday laws g. divisibility h. legality i. waging laws j. restrictive covenant ? A contract that restricts competition.?
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
a. equal dignities rule b. merger clause c. parol evidence rule d. surety e. executor f. material terms g. integrated contract h. Statute of Frauds i. partially integrated contract j. strict construction Specific requirements to satisfy the Statute of Frauds.
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).