To what extent do you feel arguments, even wars, result because people construe events with different construct systems? Defend your answer with Kelly's personal construct theory
What will be an ideal response?
ANS: Students' answers will vary.
According to the sociality corollary of Kelly's personal construct theory, it is not enough for one person to construe or interpret experiences in the same way as another person. The first person must also construe the other person's constructs. In other words, we must understand how another person thinks if we are to anticipate how that person will predict events. Each role is a behavior pattern that evolves from understanding how the other person construes events. In a sense, then, we fit ourselves into the other person's constructs.
In conflicts between nations and countries which escalate into wars, either parties fail to fit themselves in the constructs of the other party, which leads to the lack of congeniality between the two. This can be attributed to the lack of permeability of the constructs of any or both of the conflicting parties. An impermeable or rigid construct is not capable of being changed, no matter what our experiences tell us.
However, Kelly stated that we are not prisoners of our past mistakes concerning aggression and are not bound by historical determinism. Therefore, we can learn new constructs to replace old constructs that are better suited for in our lives.
You might also like to view...
Clients who keep extensive records of their automatic thoughts and emotional reactions to events are engaged in the form of psychotherapy known as Gestalt Therapy
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
The effect resulting from following cohorts over time in a cross-sequential design is called
a. A Null hypothesis b. A Time lag effect c. A Longitudinal effect d. A Cohort effect
When DeGroot tested the working memories of expert and novice chess players by briefly
showing them chess pieces on a board, experts performed better than novices a. only if the pieces were placed randomly on the board. b. only if the pieces were placed in recognizable geometric patterns. c. when the pieces were ordered as if a game was in progress. d. if they were able to view the placement of the pieces for at least two minutes. e. regardless of the pattern the pieces were arranged in.
Which section of a paper compares research studies?
a. The discussion b. The introduction c. The final section d. The body of the paper