Why is it important to consider the missing information when evaluating a particular case?
What will be an ideal response?
No case occurs in a vacuum. When a case makes it into the court system for argument, there are people doing the arguing. Although those making the arguments are going to have to rely on a certain set of facts to make their argument, people run into the limits of their own experience and perceptions. In many instances, people will often see what they want to see, and will consequently select certain facts as relevant to a particular case. Because people are only likely to include a certain set of facts based on their experience, there are likely to be other facts out there that are relevant to a particular case. Therefore, it is important to consider relevant missing information.
You might also like to view...
Which of the following is a consequence of NAFTA?
A. Hundreds of thousands of American jobs were lost. B. U.S. manufacturers who had their manufacturing plants in Mexico moved them back to the United States. C. Prices of many products manufactured in Canada fell significantly. D. Mexican companies lost market share to European manufacturers.
Concerns regarding roads, electricity, banking facilities, communication, and educational systems have to do with a country's:
A. political climate. B. balance of payments. C. economics. D. infrastructure.
Which of the following is correct with regard to treaties in the United States legal system?
a. They have no legal effect. b. Under the U.S. Constitution, they must be signed by the President and approved by the U.S. Senate. c. They have no effect on business law. d. They must be approved by the states before they have the force of law.
Some basics of corporate governance include keeping accurate records, using financial controls, creating an advisory board, using company profits as personal funds as needed.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)