Answer the following statement(s) true (T) or false (F)

Question

1.In United States v. E. C. Knight (1895) the Supreme Court held that the federal government could not regulate the sugar-refining industry because the refining process was an intrastate activity that had no direct effect on interstate commerce.
2.South Dakota v. Dole (1987) (a case involving federal restriction on government grants to the states) is an example of the principle that the federal government cannot regulate by using the spending power what it cannot regulate directly.
3.According to Berman v. Parker (1954 case involving urban renewal programs in Washington, D.C.) and Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff (1984 Hawaii land reform case), a key factor in determining whether the public use requirement has been violated is whether the government program provides for the ownership of property taken from one private individual eventually to be transferred to another private individual.
4.In Penn Central Transportation Company v. City of New York (1978), the Supreme Court held that Penn Central suffered an economic loss when the city of New York denied the company permission to build an office tower on the location of the Grand Central Terminal. Because that denial was based on the city’s program of preserving historical buildings for the general public good and also placed a severe economic hardship on Penn Central, it constituted a taking and the city was required to provide Penn Central just compensation for its loss.

Answer 1

1.true
2.false
3.false
4.false